Scholastic Qualities, Primary and Secondary
نویسنده
چکیده
The distinction between two kinds of qualities, primary and secondary, is one of the core doctrines of Scholastic natural philosophy. Far from being an invention of the modern era, it is something to which any student of Aristotelian philosophy—which is to say anyone who studied philosophy in a European university up until the eighteenth century—would have been introduced at a tender age. The distinction is, moreover, every bit as important for Scholastic philosophers as it would become in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, since the primary qualities, on the Aristotelian tradition, are the fundamental causal agents of the natural world. The locus classicus for the Scholastic idea is the beginning of Book II ofOn Generation and Corruption, where Aristotle attempts to tease out the fundamental qualities of the natural bodies around us. Considering Empedocles’s proposal that there are four basic elements—Earth, Water, Air, Fire—Aristotle argues that this thesis can be proved correct by establishing that there are four basic qualities:
منابع مشابه
Locke on the Propria of Body
Seth Pringle-Pattison (233n1) observed that Locke " teaches a twofold mystery—in the first place, of the essence ('for the powers or qualities that are observable by us are not the real essence of that substance, but depend upon it or flow from it'), and in the second place, of the substance itself ('Besides, a man has no idea of substance in general, nor knows what substance is in itself.' Bk....
متن کاملA Theory of Secondary Qualities
The secondary qualities are those qualities of objects that bear a certain relation to our sensory powers: roughly, they are those qualities that we can readily detect only through a certain distinctive phenomenal experience. Contrary to what is sometimes supposed, there is nothing about the world itself (independent of our minds) that determines the distinction between primary and secondary qu...
متن کاملMathematical Expressibility, Perceptual Relativity, and Secondary Qualities
During the seventeenth century, several apparently very disparate reasons were advanced for a believing that there is an important distinction between primary and secondary qualities. The most prominent were (1) the overall explanatory success of a physical science which refers only to primary qualities (2) the mathematical expressibility of primary but not secondary qualities, and (3) the immu...
متن کاملLocke ’ s Resemblance Theses
1 Preparatory Remarks Locke asserts that " the Ideas of primary Qualities of Bodies, are Resemblances of them, and their Patterns do really exist in the Bodies themselves; But the Ideas, produced in us by these Secondary Qualities, have no resemblance of them at all. " 1 On an unsophisticated way of taking his words, he means that ideas of primary qualities are like the qualities they represent...
متن کاملReid’s Foundation for the Primary/Secondary Quality Distinction
Thomas Reid (1710-1796) offers an under-appreciated account of the primary/secondary quality distinction. He gives sound reasons for rejecting the views of Locke, Boyle, Galileo and others, and presents a better alternative, according to which the distinction is epistemic rather than metaphysical. Primary qualities, for Reid, are qualities whose intrinsic natures can be known through sensation....
متن کامل